Today, almost all DAOs are dystopically centralized - with a few whales effectively controlling them, decentralization theater aside. This is fine for a business, but unacceptable for communities. So, how can DAOs evolve to be less plutocratic?

Today, almost all DAOs are dystopically centralized - with a few whales effectively controlling them, decentralization theater aside. This is fine for a business, but unacceptable for communities. So, how can DAOs evolve to be less plutocratic?

https://polynya.mirror.xyz/AJ89iCtY_fQ6KG1vBvzgyQhXAeNtNTwhzdLqqR7asA8

There is a vast literature on empowering shareholder minority groups (akin quadratic voting), don’t you think veto power can be easily abused?

3 dimensional being, with 2 dimensional perception, and 1 dimensional output (code). also building https://joiny.me 

Could you recommend more on empowering sharehokder minority groups? Specially if it isn’t about quadratic voting which is gameable without proof of humanity.

Humanist, lovepunk, engineer, experience producer, musician, angel. DAOs since ‘16. Experimenting with human protocols, trust networks & decentralized societies

of course sybil attack is always a problem in such cases, but try to google “Storable Voting” to begin with