Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mantej Rajpal πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ  pfp
Mantej Rajpal πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@mantej.eth
πŸ˜³πŸ˜… Anyone have any optimistic things to say about this? https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/13/24178079/openai-board-paul-nakasone-nsa-safety
9 replies
4 recasts
43 reactions

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r.eth
the silver lining of the NSA was a small working group of cryptography nerds that pushed SHA. this is some head, though, so maybe there's general realpolitik that would benefit users & researchers. then again, seems like potentially consolidated interest (not for the public).
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
Are you familiar with Ash's thesis? https://situational-awareness.ai/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r.eth
yes, but treat that with the appropriate amount of salt. there seems to be very little mention of multi-party security, which as we know is absolutely critical to distributed computing. it's also sensationalistic wrt the classic talking points (e.g. biosafety).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

assayer pfp
assayer
@assayer
Thank you for the input, I took it with a whole bucket of salt :) "potentially consolidated interest (not for the public)" is what bothers me a lot 100 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction