lufagibb π
@lufagibb
438 Following
187 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
8 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
10 replies
5 recasts
57 reactions
82 replies
38 recasts
204 reactions
44 replies
9 recasts
60 reactions
18 replies
24 recasts
348 reactions
44 replies
12 recasts
133 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, weβll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 20 replies
20 recasts
94 reactions
26 replies
9 recasts
315 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
33 replies
10 recasts
75 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 replies
1 recast
24 reactions
24 replies
36 recasts
137 reactions