i made a kinda dumb cast month or so ago that i didn’t respect anon accounts that have nothing to lose so they attack people. 

i should’ve been more nuanced. 

i think pseudonymous accounts like roon, daniel, formerly beff jezos are essential to growing a social platform — and farcaster needs them. are any here?

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

Aurarchitect for /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

@na 
@0xen ?

@dawufi is kinda pseudonymous, probably is to most users

Be specific.     

leonasskau.co.uk //
Hosting /strategy, /leo, /geopolitics // built Culture3.com // online: leosn.xyz
d33m:mun

I have nothing to lose so I attack myself.

Agree — I would say that aella and roon are v different, more personable, to Beff, who in turn I see as the epitome of the brand version of your criteria. Balaji has become similar to Beff

But I think FC doesn’t lend itself to that ‘brand personality’; FC is more about conversation than thought leadeeship

@0xen is definitely anon and brings an important POV to Farcaster, but — and i say this with zero shade — i wouldn't necessarily consider him a counter-cultural thought leader or brand the same way the anon accounts of aella, roon, beff jezos, etc. which function more as brands than as individuals.