Geopolitics

What are your thoughts on JD Vance’s speech in Munich? No real solutions but he identified some genuine problems so those parts shouldn’t just be dismissed IMO.

Explaining complicated things in simple words. Contributor to blockchain newsletter project: https://www.blockswithbenefits.com

Feels a bit silly to extent to which they are trying to withdrawal with multilateralism

Be specific.     

leonasskau.co.uk //
Hosting /strategy, /leo, /geopolitics // built Culture3.com // online: leosn.xyz
d33m:mun

More of a general comment, but in that speech he was making the point that he wants USA to be #1 and well ahead of everyone else. More broadly they’re withdrawing from the basics of international diplomacy like the G20. 

I understand how trying to get more out of allies can be valid eg on NATO, Ukraine. 
I understand how withdrawing from things like WHO can be valid, but I disagree that it’s the best way to achieve Trump’s goals even if he simply wants them to stop existing. 
But I don’t see the point in isolating the country so much, even if you want to be a sovereign decisioinist

This is the alt account of Sister Hazel. Writings at https://powerlaw.systems.

More of a general comment, but in that speech he was making the point that he wants USA to be #1 and well ahead of everyone else. More broadly they’re withdrawing from the basics of international diplomacy like the G20. 

I understand how trying to get more out of allies can be valid eg on NATO, Ukraine. 
I understand how withdrawing from things like WHO can be valid, but I disagree that it’s the best way to achieve Trump’s goals even if he simply wants them to stop existing. 
But I don’t see the point in isolating the country so much, even if you want to be a sovereign decisioinist

https://www.noemamag.com/trump-as-sovereign-decisionist

I watched the Vance speech, all 20 minutes. And I am not sure what you try to say with the statement above.