Claude 3 Opus when asked, "what concepts, if they existed in language, would allow humans to more felicitously explore and express valuable ideas?"

Brilliant ideas. ChatGPT's response doesn't even compare

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

I don’t think they are as distinct as you say — point 5 for both is essentially identical

I recognise that Claude suggestions are more better, but it’s not like GPT has no meta ideas, even if they are only ‘add these new types of words’ rather than ‘linguistic frameworks’

ChatGPT seems much more Western

Be specific.     

leonasskau.co.uk //
Hosting /strategy, /leo, /geopolitics d33m:mun

What’s lame about ChatGPT is that it is basically suggesting fields that already have language development taking place. It’s like it’s pointing to saplings and saying “we should plant trees there”