Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
df
@df
zora, rodeo and interface all leverage public farcaster data to solve the cold start problem for their own private social networks, with their own follow & comment systems. Follows & comments in these apps aren't published back to farcaster. is this a phase, or a broader indication of the long term incentives around apps leveraging social protocols just for GTM?
19 replies
10 recasts
52 reactions
nis.eth
@literature
Some observations: - Interface born before FC was popular. IMO it's been high friction to rebuild your social graph there. - Rodeo is establishing a different "context" around art mints, following the same people doesn't make sense. At Kiosk we're building on your FC social graph and composing with multiple protocols
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
nis.eth
@literature
I agree apps have an incentive to create a forked context and social graph, if they can pull it off and scale.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
JR ↑
@juli
Creating new user clusters, new follower relationships makes sense to me (different apps, different connections & behaviors) but I believe it’s a mistake to not share the data with Farcaster as there’s still a lot of value unlocked that can be further utilized by users, other apps & the business too in the long-term. In the short-term, ofc the business might see it as a competitive, sustainable advantage. Maybe Farcaster & clients like Warpcast would be better off incorporating data in different ways when coming from different clients. > multiple social graphs, not everything automatically posted everywhere etc..
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Not so much an incentive to fork, much more trust issues with FC but we have discussed this a lot already, I don‘t think more discussion is needed actually
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
