Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/daos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links š“
@links
Itās possible that some DAOs will be enabled by an ai agent butā¦I disagree with the sentiment. When Vitalik was talking about automation at the center of DAOs, he wasnāt talking about ai agents IMHO. They can help, but DAOs are a bit too bleeding edge for LLMs to ārunā them. Itās more likely to me that ai agents will be used to connect people/other agents to the DAO.
7 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
the human is usually smarter at a niche project than the agent/llm.. that's the true dao control flippening and a guarantee of l5 agi imo
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
I always hated the X at the core Y at the edges thing. Itāll be symbiosis. Humans at the core setting vision/values via smart contracts (also at the core) that AI (at the core) is trained on to distribute tokens in alignment to it all. Weāre all at the core together and we (and the agents) are at the edges too.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boiler(Chris)
@boiler
The debate over what the meaning of āautonomousā is in DAOs has been going on for a while. Itās the duality of DAOs. Auto=automatic or autonomous as in freedom. I tend to lean into the second because if he meant the first, wouldnāt he have just said automatic. @vitalik.eth can you settle this debate once and for all?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boiler(Chris)
@boiler
I like the idea of DAOs voting on proposals to unleash a prompt on @bankr or something like that. That would be cool. Save the steps of multi call proposals that are often left to the people that know how to build the transactions.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Haier (she) š©
@haier
@zer8 š
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agusti
@bleu.eth
https://warpcast.com/bleu.eth/0xe8a7e317
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aunt Homie
@infinitehomie
/microsub tip: 635 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
