someone-build

It seems like a natural progression that:

Paper contracts → Digital contracts → Onchain contracts

- No signature software needed
- Immutable, public or private details via encryption
- Proof of digital signature

If I was one of the 7,000 docusign employees I'd be worried

Steward @ensdao, Building DAO transparency with safenotes.xyz

i'd be worried if I were one of the innovators on the zk-enabled on-chain contract apps/ protocols till one of those hybridizing trad companies acquire mine.

In such product verticals, it's usually the Stripe effect.

Need bridging? Buy the Bridge.

Or, as in the case of Skiff + Notion, need an e-mail client? Just acquire it.

It's because noone till we have global scale ultra-resilient ZK layers for formal verification will leave it "totally" to onchain contracts without any immutability except for experimenters like ourselves.

@teamSobol
DAOin’ w/ @dimoDAO, @hatsprotocol
Alum: @banklesssDAO, CityDAO, PolygonDAO

https://sign.global/ethsign does most of this

not sure if they do encrypted ones yet!

The law just has to recognize asking with corporations. 

Many still refuse anything but a wet sign