Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liam
@liam.eth
Scott Galloway effectively is saying that our economy is consistently bailing out the old & rich, isolating young men, causing a mental health crisis, rewarding capital over labor. His suggestions to improve here in the image. Curious what folks on Farcaster think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEJ4hkpQW8E
7 replies
1 recast
45 reactions
simpledelusion
@mrpepe
Yeah agree
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan
@dberg
Hard to disagree with most of this, but I don't see anything about zoning reform. Our current housing policies effectively give a massive subsidy to incumbent homeowners (i.e., boomers). We need to build massive amounts of dense housing in this country. Makes social, economic, and environmental sense.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo
@lsn
Agree except: - negative income tax - ID - national service Unclear on: - term limits
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Scott Galloway is part of the NY media scene which hates the tech industry. See also: NYT "hit pieces only" policy, etc. His ideas in the other three column seem OK, the tech ones are poison pills. "Identity verification" and "age gating" would be the end of the open web, and those are the nicer two.
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
julien
@julien51.eth
I didn't like the guy but I like a lot of the ideas here except for "Identity verification" in tech.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yondon Fu
@yondon.eth
Wouldn't removing 230 protection increase likelihood of entrenching big tech if they are the only algo content platforms that can deal with legal costs w/o that protection?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Valerie
@vrose.eth
Seems well intended. Probably not realistic to make most of this federal policy in the US because of the state of our politics. I'm personally less convinced that social media/tech, as opposed to economics and advertising, is the main cause of mental health problens.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
