Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

afra pfp
afra
@afra
Unpopular take: discussions on network states have even less female involvement than the male-centric world of crypto. There’s a critical gap that needs exploration—either something is missing, or there's a barrier deterring women from joining the conversation.
5 replies
2 recasts
7 reactions

Tom pfp
Tom
@tomskyrme
I noticed this. Missing a vital perspective. Why do you think women aren’t more involved in network states?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

afra pfp
afra
@afra
I find myself often slightly freaked out about the male-driven impulse for world-building. This fear isn't just about the act itself but what it often entails: a shaping of our reality that frequently marginalizes the female existence.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Lex Sokolin pfp
Lex Sokolin
@lex
I think you are right in that men don’t design well for women, and the data supports this claim. Examples are things like size of car seats and airbag injuries, temperature in offices, etc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom pfp
Tom
@tomskyrme
Also see most of healthcare 😬
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction