Unpopular take: discussions on network states have even less female involvement than the male-centric world of crypto. There’s a critical gap that needs exploration—either something is missing, or there's a barrier deterring women from joining the conversation.

ineffective accelerationism/
backpain negentropy/ with mask network

I noticed this. Missing a vital perspective. Why do you think women aren’t more involved in network states?

Founder, Animus - thinking about networks, information marketplaces, coordination/governance and work-learn dynamics - passionate about fixing healthcare 

Would this not make women more interested by the prospect of ‘building from scratch’ instead of having to fight to change current systems?

The extreme example being the popularity of recent Barbie film where she literally has her own world

I find myself often slightly freaked out about the male-driven impulse for world-building. This fear isn't just about the act itself but what it often entails: a shaping of our reality that frequently marginalizes the female existence.

Maybe it's the "Exit culture" (vs "building community") that seems more central to how Network States are described that is a lot more attractive to men (maybe more specifically techies) that doesn't resonate as much w women?