Unpopular take: discussions on network states have even less female involvement than the male-centric world of crypto. There’s a critical gap that needs exploration—either something is missing, or there's a barrier deterring women from joining the conversation.

Tipping $ degen to my ❤️, thank you for vibing with me.
69000 $DEGEN

ineffective accelerationism/
backpain negentropy/ with mask network

Principal Investigator @AW_Research
LEGO Builder, start from abacus to ZK and never abandon.
https://calendly.com/gink-awresearch/aw-research-60-min


Founder, Animus - thinking about networks, information marketplaces, coordination/governance and work-learn dynamics - passionate about fixing healthcare 

I find myself often slightly freaked out about the male-driven impulse for world-building. This fear isn't just about the act itself but what it often entails: a shaping of our reality that frequently marginalizes the female existence.

I noticed this. Missing a vital perspective. Why do you think women aren’t more involved in network states?

Founder of The Collective Solution

Incubating the tech superstars of tomorrow - building the future while remaining rooted in ancient wisdom

but why a certain group of people would lack interest in this seemingly universal topic? Unless the frame of this topic is insular

what if it isn't about barriers to entry & more about simply a lack of interest ?

many thoughts here

i think crypto is male dominated, venture is male dominated, all the pillars are male dominated and that has follow-on effects