Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
As a user with a Farcaster account, I'd rather see someone's Farcaster username in your app than their ENS. I interact with people's Farcaster username, not their ENS. The namespace more closely associated with online identity and my social graph will win.
19 replies
9 recasts
65 reactions
sand.base.eth
@sandman
The Farcaster username <> Ethereum address connection is under-utilised rn.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
It will continue to be underused. It's too complicated and most users won't care. Also, is @vitalik the person as vitalik.eth? Or is it a scammer? It gets confusing and I think there needs to be one dominant namespace for users to trust who they are interacting with.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tomu
@tomu
it’s possible to set your username as vitalik.eth without connecting your wallet? Cus that’s the only thing that can verify you are chatting with the real vitalik
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sand.base.eth
@sandman
That’s so shitty. @vitalik.eth is probably not the same as @vitalik. I honestly don’t understand the need to stick to just one namespace. .eth is a monopoly for ETH addresses, it’s expensive and doesn’t work for L2s. Farcaster>ENS. ENS has no social graph. ENS should use Farcaster, not the other way around.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
