We closed the @daylight Discord server. 

All in on the /daylight channel!

So many startups tried to build “web3 Discord” via copypaste.

Turns out you had to approach it from the side.

So many startups tried to build “web3 Discord” via copypaste.

Turns out you had to approach it from the side. https://warpcast.com/kyle/0xe20af3ba

summoning /daylight | kylemccollom.com | we are hiring: careers.daylight.xyz

founder / degen / dev / ⛷️ / 🎶 / 

working on blockchain data access @noves

Doesn't make sense for all communities.

But for many, multiple channels are overkill.

And you can use a different app and algo for this use case since everything is open.

Isn't it problematic to not have any kind of subchannel feature? Can't imagine some discords getting smashed into one channel.

Plus I'm not sure if standard visibility algo is ideal for this use case. Maybe if channels had some settings related to what the purpose was and then tuned how they handled ordering, etc.

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

So true. Reminds me of the 40 min long interview of @dwr.eth and @jessepollak. 

They discussed why it was important not to get users first but to get contributing users. Meaning devs - who could ship cool stuff. 

This will, in turn, bring new users. 

Talk about approaching from the other side. Profound insight.

I'm debating doing the same. 😅

Discord servers are pretty low value and a big time suck.

how long have you been doing this and aren't they for different purposes or do you feel like you're not missing much from discord?

Exploration is open 👐.
Mark Zuckerberg 😂 will explain better