Varun Srinivasan
@v
Should we rebrand Warpcast to Farcaster? We separated Warpcast (the app) from Farcaster (the protocol) a few years ago. We've heard from many new users that this is very, very confusing. People hear about Farcaster, search in the app store, can't find anything called Farcaster and then churn.
372 replies
117 recasts
849 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Tbh I’m not attached to farcaster as the name for the protocol, I just think it is actually important for the client to have a different name from the protocol I like the idea @runninyeti.eth suggested here. If the client becomes Farcaster maybe there’s an opportunity to rename the protocol for the sake of preserving this distinction https://warpcast.com/runninyeti.eth/0x2f31eb1d
7 replies
1 recast
39 reactions
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
This doesn’t solve the problem Varun just described.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
i agree but 1. i think the problem varun is describing is something that is completely avoidable i.e. warpcast is confusing their users in their messaging 2. from what i can tell they view farcaster as the stronger brand and therefore want it to be the name of the product to help short term conversion rates (?) https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x4eb30810 imo the name is unimportant and a rebrand will be even more confusing at the cost of neutrality
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction