Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
Its possible we should reframe The Burn as The Great Public Goods Distribution — the mechanics are the same, but gut reaction from onlookers probably isnt
10 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
While I’m not necessarily married to the current name, I think The Burn implies a serious tone and feels like something we’d want to avoid. That’s a a good thing.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
I think there’s a bit of a catch 22. The burn has to be significantly less palatable than investing in Nouns. Pure burning seems insanely inefficient,,, allocating to a charity is better,,, but shouldn’t be something members prefer.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
> investing in nouns help me understand; literally buying back nouns supply?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
As in deploying capital to props (investing in Nouns) should be much more attractive than “letting the capital burn”
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
ah got it, yes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
help me see whats the catch 22?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction