Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
5 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
SQX
@sqx
Shouldn’t you use a decay structure in your forward income. As well as a potential fork that will halve the treasury?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
its a starting point gets complex real quick if we gonna try to predict forks, and this is better than no info
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
SQX
@sqx
Agree. If you ever want some help. These are the types of things I do irl. Well, trade so I forecast. I live my life 100 Monte Carlo simulations at a time. 🤣🤣
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
krel
@krel
its more a matter of time(cost) vs gain for us -- we usually develop features is smaller increments to try out community sentiment and usefulness before investing too much but if youre keen to hack on a forecast with decay that you think would make more sense i wont stop you! (no promises tho)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
been meaning too. (same issue time! haha) for a long bit! have it in my head. reality exceeded model to the downside. ooofff. see about getting nerman to link to Camp btw . cc @joel so much more info than nouns.wtf. big camp fan.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions