Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
It seems inevitable for nouns to one day have a more formal way of saying "you're a citizen of noun world" And it will NOT be owning a Noun, as we slowly grow the world and the DAO is no longer synonymous with the movement (it already isn't, but the diff isn't huge yet). I'm applying for citizenship in advance!
5 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
somehow I find myself resisting the “networked state” definition so hard
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Say more please
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
the obsession around owning territory feels backwards to me. like as if it doesn’t believe a digital world can be real enough to matter.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
imo not territory but cultural relevance, thats the one thing balaji got wrong
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
the noggstacle is ”territory”, dustins statue is ”territory”, nounish IG is ”territory”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

necfas pfp
necfas
@necfas
ye, i think cultural relevance is the big thing here
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction