Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/higher
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

john pfp
john
@know
???
4 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
Why does LP need to be permanently locked?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

john pfp
john
@know
answered, anything else come to mind?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
Making it a burn/donation will really limit the amount ppl are willing to put in the pool
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

john pfp
john
@know
can you say more?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
You’re asking people for a donation, which is fine. But people won’t donate their entire net worth. If it was a normal LP that just directed fees to fund stuff, some might put their whole stack in, yielding much more in fees.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

kompreni đźš‚ pfp
kompreni đźš‚
@kompreni
"some might put their whole stack in"... and take it out later. which means no more funding for an org. permanent lps = permanent funding. imo this is really about overcoming tragedy of the commons. "People won't donate their entire net worth"... and they shouldn't. but if we all donated a percent, one-time...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
Right but all that’s missing is a commitment from the LP to provide their liquidity for some period of time or to cover some project, which could be automated/voted on. Then they could retain their capital and also be free to commit something more meaningful than 1% or whatever they’re willing to donate forever
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction