Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Katsuya pfp
Katsuya
@kn
If you have tried both, why Cursor > Github Copilot + VS Code?
9 replies
11 recasts
96 reactions

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
The right pane for easy AI chat.
1 reply
10 recasts
55 reactions

Johanna 🎩 pfp
Johanna 🎩
@johanna
Well cursor is github copilot + vs code and much more. Ability to switch between LLMs, load documentation etc for basically the same subscription price
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Chris pfp
Chris
@cmlad.eth
Tab autocompletion blows it out of the water. That's the only AI thing I use, haven't tried chat in either.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
I’m not aware of a copilot feature that lets you select code to edit, write a prompt, and mention other files to add them to context. I wouldn’t be surprised if this exists already and I haven’t found it or it will be added soon. These are not complicated features relative to the AI that it depends on.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

CV pfp
CV
@c-v
Composer, tab auto completion, Claude Sonet 3.5
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
People have said the pane and Composer but I do think the overall UX like tab auto completion and integrated menu options is great. The Composer is nice because it can tokenize a decent amount of files rather than what seems like limited context in Copilot. I assume VSCode will catch up to this.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dix 🎩  pfp
Dix 🎩
@dix0x1.eth
Cursor is just better.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction