Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Britt Kim
@brittkim.eth
Before channels were decentralized, WC experimented with a short-lived channel to discuss WWDC and maybe some sports event (I donāt remember). You could call it a āflashā channel. It was meh. But I think it was close to something good. When notable events happen, casts/threads are not the best for real-time discussion. These kinds of conversations are best unstructured and somewhat off the record. What works on Twitter is live spaces. What someone says in a space isnāt obvious from their feed. This can be emboldening. Also, the āI was thereā feeling is rewarding and is an itch that isnāt scratched currently with WC. Does WC need spaces? No. What WC has is DCs. Can something be done with them? Flash DC groups where FOMO drives engagement? Presidential debates are around the corner, and Iād like a Temporary convo with others, without polluting my feed with lame political musings. The same is true with WWDCs and other unexpected events such as Altmanās past board dispute at OpenAI.
7 replies
13 recasts
103 reactions
KMacš ā©
@kmacb.eth
Is it enough if people think the data is ephemeral or does the data need to be āprivateā to only those present at time of a cast eg. Been playing with FIP-2 āog channelsā for this ephemeral live chat feeling. Sadly, there is no concept or norm for honoring an apps context-container. eg d33m sends a cast to a FIP-2 āpopupā channel (d33m room) for a Euros match & WC pollutes home freed & followers w notifications. Name spaces might help here.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
