Completely discounting EU for any technological progress from here on out. As if the tech landscape in EU isn’t already dire.

Completely discounting EU for any technological progress from here on out. As if the tech landscape in EU isn’t already dire. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/08/technology/eu-ai-act-regulation.html

The main product the EU exports these days is rules and regulations.

I’m reserving my judgment until I read the actual legislation. The WIP legislation from last June seemed to have sensible language (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698792/EPRS_BRI(2021)698792_EN.pdf): 1/

Computational biologist, data scientist, digital artist | 
https://clauswilke.art/links | Hosting /ai-art & /clauswilke

From what I gathered, reading on multiple sources, this Act is more an inconvenience for most to catch a few bad actors. Much like the TSA.

Behind a paywall. Does anybody have details about these rules publicly accessible?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dax-LkfJgtY&list=PL9EwYLvetl4iSUTlbLQMmRLNcS1Fb-_TX&ab_channel=MOSTLYAI

This is a good deep dive into it. From what I gathered, it's difficult not to rely on service providers i.e. OAI to bypass your obligations to the act. It will be difficult for on-premise/privately run LLMs.

Designing and building AI systems

https://agents.gladio.ai

Interested to see the scope of their « regulatory sandbox »

If the innovation process goes from test, deploy, sell, iterate to now: form abc, test, enter sandbox pending provisions, ask daddy EU for permission, get some users onboard EU will be dead in the water and even more brain drained than it is already

Its becoming more and more obvious why countries would want to leave EU.

I discounted AI a decade ago when I realize that utter normies from NGO wastemakers between 18 and 25 become MPs in a couple of years.