The memecoin meta in its current state is nihilistic and, in many cases, soulless

NFTs were more purpose driven, creative, relatable, and fun

The only reason NFTs are not so back is because they don't have liquidity pools and they must be sold/bought in with all or nothing

also

NFTs are significantly better than tokens for "coining content"

incentivizing things @ poidh.xyz - come chill /poidh + follow @poidhbot

NFTs have evolved into at least four categories.

First, there are name NFTs like yourname.eth. These are the easiest to understand because they are just like domain names or usernames.

Next, there are profile NFTs like Bored Ape. These have value because they are like club memberships, and people make them part of their public identity.

Next, there are Zora-style content coins like horse (see reply), which update the art NFT model by setting up a market for every Instagram-style post. Buyers buy these coins to show appreciation for the creator, to speculate on how much more popular a given post will get, and sometimes to show (via onchain timestamps) that they’re early to spotting new talent.

Finally, there are micro-NFTs that just represent onchain data, akin to “typed likes”. Many social actions are now cheap enough to record onchain.

Someone thinks that Zora’s contentcoins are essentially a category of NFTs..

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

Someone thinks that Zora’s contentcoins are essentially a category of NFTs..
https://warpcast.com/balajis.eth/0xdbfd16f2

I feel like the only reason "coining" content exists was to cash in on the memecoin meta. It makes less sense in every other way to me

reply guys

https://warpcast.com/borst.eth/0xb448d6e7