incentivizing things @ poidh.xyz - come chill /poidh + follow @poidhbot

They know, too. That’s why this book is able to exist

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

it's almost like there are natural forces at play undermining the wealthy which can help curb inequality without the need for government regulation (which paradoxically helps entrench wealth since it becomes captured by the people it's supposed to regulate)

No. As the book demonstrates they make new stories for themselves that justifies an ever increasing hoard. 

Your reg capture argument is special nonsense. Juries can be biased. Does that mean we shouldn’t have trials? Equivalent logic there

juries have an expiration date

bureaucracies do not

I'm not saying all human organizations are corrupt, I'm saying that, given enough time, they will inevitably become corrupt (if they have any sort of power worth capturing)

private institutions don't have the power of violence

ok, they get corrupted, then what? they try to convince you to give them your money harder?

you have free will to avoid interacting with a corrupt monopoly

a thoroughly corrupt state can remove your right to vote and throw you in prison

voluntary civic institutions are fine, mandatory civic institutions tend toward dystopia

Yes and guess what that same logic applies to private institutions. And a  corrupt state can be voted out. A corrupt monopoly can’t.

Institutional decay is an argument for participatory politics not abolishment of the civic institutions