Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
this is both true but wrong besides the facts people like to pay other people and this increases their satisfaction with the experience, and that people like to collect things, and people like artifacts with their name and face on it the add a silly mint is like amoeba version of what might be built out of world with durable public social little artifacts like this floating around, getting combined and remixed, etc
3 replies
9 recasts
14 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I can see this but I also can’t. I used to feel this way but then realized I was amassing a giant digital junk drawer. I felt bad too because during a down market I spent $$ that appreciated so rapidly in the recovery that I felt stupid because in hindsight I was paying way too much for trinkets. It made me very wary of spending ETH. I want to share the optimism that people will use the composability and extensibility of these artifacts in cool ways. I will meditate on that
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

‿ pfp
@na
question i guess is how much is the slop-demand and how much is the slop-supply?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
paying a lot of $$$ for things based on speculative value doesn't feel right paying tiny sums of $$$ to support things you like and adding hardness to certain interactions / pieces of data does feel right similar to your comment the other day about buying a coin to support vs buying a coin to speculate, but even more so
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction