Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
phil
@phil
I've been thinking a lot about the community's allergic reaction to last week's AMA. Clearly, there was a culture clash. Robin came in with a negative tone and voiced complaints, which people don't like (hello mood affiliation). He also didn't genuflect to crypto to try and make us like him, although it would have been easy to do that. And many people's responses were: ok boomer, go somewhere else. But what if Robin just happens to be the only one to say what others are thinking? He is active on Twitter and has been blogging for nearly two decades, so it wasn't purely a technology issue. What can we learn?
14 replies
12 recasts
104 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
This is also generally the response from the site itself about complaints. Revealed vs stated and all that. 🤷🏼‍♀️ He mentioned things I have seen people like @nicholas bring up too. A lot of what he said wasn’t even novel feedback. I mostly saw people kind of excited or amused about his crypto stance. On that regard I think people here can take it. Might be cope from me though
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
his responses were a bit curt, but robin’s posts were funny and honest. i recasted this one while loling bc it’s so brash — and i don’t feel threatened by it at all. when a smart person takes the time to deliver intellectually honest critical feedback, the correct answer is “thank you, i hear you,” not defensive dismissal engaging is an act of generosity amongst mortal beings. the way we react to people who are frustrated or disappointed can alter their experience substantially, and even encourage them to like a place, despite their misgivings. https://warpcast.com/nicholas/0x0cbd7069
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
