keccers
@keccers.eth
One unfortunate thing here is like …. The world is so complex but the way everything demands your attention requires that complexity to be distilled down and then often rage-bait-ified This leads people to serious misunderstandings that are incredibly hard to correct This article was shared in the BRCA gene (breast cancer risk gene) support subreddit. OP insinuates that this litigation threatens BRCA surveillance care and prophylactic surgeries It absolutely does not. Mammograms aren’t even on the list being debated! To say nothing of the mastectomy/hysterectomy surgeries she alludes to. There is no bearing to BRCA at all. But to learn this, you need to read the article AS WELL AS reference the ACA guidelines — it’s cognitive load, it’s work! And by the time I get to this, plenty of people have already been fear mongered, have a position, are upset. I tried to leave a comment and now I’m depressed no one seems to be reading And this doesn’t even get into the incentive to LIE
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
I am extremely knowledgeable about all things health related. This is where I have gone deep on my T. But I know that almost assuredly I have been gotten got like this on things outside my expertise. It’s so terrifying. Even dumb shit. Like I totally was fooled by the AI pic of the Hollywood sign burning until @ted told me I had been tricked It’s very tough out there Idk where it all goes
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
christin
@christin
more brandolini's law :S
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
AJ
@awedjob.eth
It is exhausting. I would say make the post anyway. Yes there are other posts and casts that have snared the best of us. "Trust but verify" seems to compete with "assume positive intent". Someone who pursues the truth does not mind too much admitting when they are wrong. This is how we spot each other.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
