keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
One unfortunate thing here is like …. The world is so complex but the way everything demands your attention requires that complexity to be distilled down and then often rage-bait-ified This leads people to serious misunderstandings that are incredibly hard to correct This article was shared in the BRCA gene (breast cancer risk gene) support subreddit. OP insinuates that this litigation threatens BRCA surveillance care and prophylactic surgeries It absolutely does not. Mammograms aren’t even on the list being debated! To say nothing of the mastectomy/hysterectomy surgeries she alludes to. There is no bearing to BRCA at all. But to learn this, you need to read the article AS WELL AS reference the ACA guidelines — it’s cognitive load, it’s work! And by the time I get to this, plenty of people have already been fear mongered, have a position, are upset. I tried to leave a comment and now I’m depressed no one seems to be reading And this doesn’t even get into the incentive to LIE
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
more brandolini's law :S
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I think I have to let it go. But this can’t be good
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction