keccers
@keccers.eth
Bryan Johnson has been proactively trying to get ahead of this NYT piece — it’s here It says that Bryan is extremely controlling of his employees and wields this control through extraordinary confidentiality agreements I don’t expect a ton of sympathy for the worker here. I understand how you could have a positive perspective on these agreements. It is an individual’s choice whether or not to work for Bryan. BUT — the piece also suggests there may be more than meets the eye to the protocol, which many follow. Bryan’s medical advisor featured in the Netflix documentary, resigned over concerns related to the protocol. In Bryan’s own study of 1700 people, many people had adverse effects when following Blueprint. When Bryan reported on the work, he released data on only 300 participants Blueprint clearly works for many if not all and I’m not trying to tell you to stop eating nutty pudding. But be judicious in the advice you take. Don’t be a blind follower Unlocked gift link in reply 👇
4 replies
3 recasts
24 reactions
Metaphorical
@hyp
30% of clinical trials fail due to toxicity. Most treatments are more likely to harm than help (until thoroughly tested.)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
I can appreciate that although it’s important to note that there are no new drugs here — it was testing a way of life including a very strict diet. Nothing in Blueprint is a novel compound
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Matt
@mattlee
Yeah but with all those supplements the chances of no contamination with who knows what is basically 0
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Metaphorical
@hyp
What was that petri dish thing they were promoting?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
