Among the largest purple app accounts (ones with at least 3k followers).. here are the 100 most influential accounts (based on eigenvector centrality algorithm) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15Ndxoalc_Jjr7GX2h7weK-Z59K90JtcxmIiw67q1kR4

I did a quick and dirty categorization of occupations of the Top 50 Most Influential! 

Missing some nuance here (ie several folks fit across categories) but for what it is, it's fine. 

The biggest categories
Crypto founder (40%)
Merkle (founders + employees, 16%)
VCs (10%)

The one brand account to make the Top 50 most influential was Base. 
I myself come in at #58!

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

This is really interesting. I've been working on my own Farcaster influence ranking algorithm (Farcaster Cred Score).

While structurally similar, FCS focuses specifically on an "acknowledged value" subgraph - measuring incoming relationships that recognize value from reputable sources.

There's significant overlap between our lists, especially for the top 25 or so accounts, i.e. @ted is #3 on FCS and #6 on the your list.

After that, the results diverge a bit, with FCS highlighting accounts with perhaps less nominal centrality but highly efficient/impactful reach. 

Did a VLOOKUP on your list for ease of comparison.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18hnGyiWriOX7-MOhJyzN_uT3xQnh4Hhbfv2yLlPI9NM/edit?usp=sharing

I'm taking a slightly different approach to this problem that prioritizes quality of engagement over followers/being early.

Part of a broader "builder intel" product I'm working on, where people can access context on how a builder has contributed value across ecosystems.

It's a work in progress, but I think it pushes things in the right direction.

For instance, you are #21 on the FCS leaderboard but 58 on the eigenvector-score driven leaderboard.

Fwiw I dislike the concept of leaderboards, but have found that they're a good way to solicit feedback - your's would be really appreciated!

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

I'm taking a slightly different approach to this problem that prioritizes quality of engagement over followers/being early.

Part of a broader "builder intel" product I'm working on, where people can access context on how a builder has contributed value across ecosystems.

It's a work in progress, but I think it pushes things in the right direction.

For instance, you are #21 on the FCS leaderboard but 58 on the eigenvector-score driven leaderboard.

Fwiw I dislike the concept of leaderboards, but have found that they're a good way to solicit feedback - your's would be really appreciated!
https://warpcast.com/ruminations/0x2bd183bb

This is really cool! It feels more right to me in some ways. Some of the accounts on the other list aren’t really that active, so it’s hard to “feel” their influence

Thanks! Yeah, I agree. I'm currently thinking about how to introduce explainability. So I can select a person and see which relationships drive their influence.