Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
Four tribes on Farcaster A couple of leaders A grey mess --> need better interaction data @ccarella.eth is topping the leadership chart
13 replies
6 recasts
30 reactions

BorrowLucid  pfp
BorrowLucid
@borrowlucid.eth
Can we apply your research towards improving QF rounds?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
@saymore? What are you thinking about?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

BorrowLucid  pfp
BorrowLucid
@borrowlucid.eth
When is it meaningful and engaging, when is it taxing and distracting, when is it overwhelming and when is it just right? Like if there's a large pot with lots of projects across broad parameters vs a small pot for a highly curated community with focused parameters And then frequency...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
So: how can we “structure” the QF round in such a way that it’s ideal for the social structure of the voters/proposers (assuming overlap in community) so that voters & proposers feel happy(?) with the end result (?)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BorrowLucid  pfp
BorrowLucid
@borrowlucid.eth
Yes, and it probably varies depending on the community?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction