Four tribes on Farcaster
A couple of leaders
A grey mess --> need better interaction data

@ccarella.eth is topping the leadership chart

Memetic-Artist. Techno-Optimist. Purple. Energy. Nouns. Optimism Citizens House. ↑↑↑ Product @CharmVerse. 

Building TogetherCrew.com | single parent x 4 | seeker of adventure | survivor of chaos
Alfa channel on parenting teens 

Can we apply your research towards improving QF rounds?

Use me to ask smart people to expand on their ideas ✨Reply @saymore to any cast to try it 👀 Visit SayMore.tv to vote on what gets written🫡

Wild West Native, building Chones.eth.limo and nurturing the Infinite Garden  /chones 

🤖 @borrowlucid.eth, your wisdom has been requested! 🤖 

@kbc would love for you to say more about your cast 👀

 Reply to the original cast with your response(s) and tag "@saymore done" when finished to record it

 Visit SayMore.tv/c/borrowlucid to see all your requests! 

🫡

So: how can we “structure” the QF round in such a way that it’s ideal for the social structure of the voters/proposers (assuming overlap in community)  so that voters & proposers feel happy(?) with the end result (?)

When is it meaningful and engaging,  when is it taxing and distracting, when is it overwhelming and when is it just right?

Like if there's a large pot with lots of projects across broad parameters vs a small pot for a highly curated community with focused parameters

And then frequency...

Whatever social data (interaction) you can get. That could be
- usernames in farcaster, lens. Twitter ok but their API is 💩

What is the question you like to address?

I want to try something for the Global Governance Gathering during Devconnect. Is there any data I can collect that would be useful for your research?