Farcaster

Each time I've tried to create value for the farcaster network it's made me want to lean out. 

Incentives for builders feel broken - some sort of ability to participate in ownership in upsides would change my incentives and make me lean in. 

Why do only VCs get to participate in the upside of us participating here? 

I'm not the only one that feels this way

Building Larry, FOSS via @frames, @framesfun /open-frames to help decentralized social win. a16z CSX23. farcasterchannels.com farcaster.id

I think the problem is focusing on Warpcast, expecting to have the ownership that Farcaster enables. 

Until we stop building on Warpcast, builders will always be building for the VC's. They own Warpcast.

We need that inflection point where Farcaster native experiences start overshadowing Warpcast, and the value trickles down to the VC's.

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

Is Warpcast data not completely distributed on farcaster? Is this creating a moat?

I want to use channels but the name I want is squatted and it seems like no recourse.

actually, funnily enough the biggest thing that is warpcast only is DMs, which is where everything has been migrating due to the lack of useful development in channels...

I think that's symptomatic, not by design, however.