Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
What are people's thoughts on Lido about to pass Danny Ryan's critical threshold of 33%, it currently sits at 32.3% https://dune.com/hildobby/eth2-staking https://notes.ethereum.org/@djrtwo/risks-of-lsd For more: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6NwUIEMohR2R2klRl9OkBK?si=72d804943fe741a2 @evanvanness
3 replies
2 recasts
4 reactions

Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
TLDR why he thinks it's a major concern: A small group of people (VCs) control the majority of the LDO governance token. If Lido exceeds the 33% threshold and regulators tell the VCs to shut it down, the network could face finality disruptions and could face potential coordinated manipulation or censorships attacks
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
TLDR why it's not: Ultimately, one LSD will dominate due to superior fees, liquidity, etc. If Lido doesn't surpass the 33% threshold, another LSD will. To align Lido more closely with Ethereum, a dual governance structure is in place, allowing stETH holders to veto LDO holder proposals Correct me if I'm wrong @hasu
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kaimi ⬆🎩  pfp
Kaimi ⬆🎩
@kaimi
“Ultimately, one LSD will dominate due to superior fees. If Lido doesn't surpass the 33% threshold, another LSD will” This is nothing more than a guess^^ what bothers me is I keep seeing it everywhere presented as a “holy truth”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction