Kishan Bagaria pfp
Kishan Bagaria
@k
it's interesting that telegram keeps working on these increasingly complicated features but still hasn't shipped anything for improving secret chats / end-to-end encryption in a while
7 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

daniel pfp
daniel
@pcdkd
signal similar? shipping stories vs things like moving away from phone-based identity.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
this is one of the primary reasons i left telegram https://blog.borodutch.com/i-quit-telegram-heres-why/
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
yeah I would have expected them to "beat Signal" vs. the Discord competitor stuff
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ace pfp
ace
@ace
how big is the demand for such level of encryption? curious. i hear it in the tech bubble, but no friends outside of tech seem to care around me.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
I would be interested in what % of users are actually aware of whether chats are end to end encrypted. My guess: less than 5% Even apps that advertise to support it sometimes require starting a special type of secret chat hidden in a menu somewhere
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matt 💭 pfp
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
it's possible they don't see much activity in these chats and so a low-use feature gets a low priority.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Origami pfp
Origami
@origami
I'd love a way to keep spammers from adding me to their groups
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction