Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July
@july
Honestly I want robots to be designed as calm technology: https://people.csail.mit.edu/rudolph/Teaching/weiser.pdf
5 replies
1 recast
53 reactions
July
@july
I’d say the main framing is seeing technology as an extension of self not as another. I think we put it in humanoid form, I think we’re gonna start to feel like these things are not extensions of ourselves, but something completely different. And I’m sure that’s gonna happen in one form or another, I don’t want the world where humanoids. I’m not sure if I am uncomfortable and I need to get over it or my intuition is just telling me this doesn’t work for me dawg
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
comz
@comz
"A calm technology will move easily from the periphery of our attention, to the center, and back. This is fundamentally encalming, for two reasons. First, by placing things in the periphery we are able to attune to many more things than we could if everything had to be at the center. Things in the periphery are attuned to by the large portion of our brains devoted to peripheral (sensory) processing. Thus the periphery is informing without overburdening." great article, and there also has to be an upper limit of calm things subtlety competing in our periphery, thus becoming overwhelming in their numbers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
oh this is interesting
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
I want off the rails of this trend of taking all the dystopian warning signs from our fictional narratives and thinking they are the targets we should be aiming at.. so many ignorant and unimaginative cretins in tech it disgusts me.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
/microsub tip: 1088 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
