What is acceptable and what is not acceptable not only changes from person to person, demographic to demographic at a certain period in time, but also changes over time drastically as well from era to era

Morality is like a breathing, evolving organism, ever changing with the time and the people that it exists with

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

The right thing to do - there is no right answer to this question either, but looking through stories of the past it’s easy to identify certain virtues in literatures from many spheres of influence - there are certain things, certain stories that resonate with us at the core - shake us to the core

What is fascinating to me:

We all seem to have a moral compass that gives us a sense of what we are willing to do, and we feel it strongly yet if anything it is a moving target. Even if we stick true to our moral compass and we don’t change, the world will change without us, and our morality will be - gasp - immoral

what’s the answer? Perhaps along the lines of do whatever you think is right. It might be wrong in the future, your past may think it’s wrong too, but doing what you believe is right even if your future self and your past self disagree with you is important to your current self - so that’s what I’m going with

How many times have you said to yourself- this is what is right and this is what is wrong and I draw the line here - and years later you look back to find yourself slightly embarrassed at your naïveté. Of course at the that time you were not naive, you were doing the right thing

editor yfarmx.com 📚 /yfarmx // security researcher // designer of virtual lands /dunevoxel 🏗 // degens go here: /frameapes

While they are often theoretically valid, in the sense there are ideas we can agree upon are objectively valid per Kant (I.e. noumena) - I think what is fair, to some people are not going to be what is fair to others, implementing it as a phenomena is very different from just theory

could some moral principles, like fairness and respect for life and personal property, be universally valid? 

Kant's 'Categorical Imperative' suggests we should only act in ways that everyone could adopt as a universal standard.

Kind of like how Nietzsche said truth is a function of power, not reality.

Or is it the manifestation and interpretation of a fundamental morality that changes?

It’s a shame the laws can’t keep pace