Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Linda Xie
@linda
I keep seeing references to Farcaster as socialfi so sharing my clarification https://x.com/ljxie/status/1833617641187250328?s=46&t=QNlz9swNdb9dxGQvZZJaCw
13 replies
64 recasts
277 reactions
JR ↑
@juli
I‘d give the same explanation but say warpcast (vs Farcaster) is a socialfi product. Social base with staying power with lots of financial experiments on top ✌🏽
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Linda Xie
@linda
I don't classify Warpcast as socialfi either. It's just a client that enables these applications built on top but its underlying function is not socialfi
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
JR ↑
@juli
The determining factor for socialFI for me is that you can do transactions right in warpcast. SocialFI seems to get a negative connotation right now due to friendtech and very speculative use cases but there‘s nothing inherently wrong with being a social fintech app - it doesn’t mean you need to be hyperspeculative, you can provide great social and financial value
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
iSpeakNerd 🧙♂️
@ispeaknerd.eth
You can *now* do *exactly 1 type of* transaction(s) *for predetermined amount* in warpcast One limited feature doesn't make the whole app suddenly socialfi when that's not the product focus
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
Socialfi is not a social app with finance / transacting signing in it. Socialfi is the financialization of a following - buying and selling of people. So Friendtech, Scoop, Drakula, BitClout, etc. Not Farcaster or Lens, which are open social graphs that you could build socialfi products on top of (like Scoop).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction