Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ChristianØ pfp
ChristianØ
@christian
"Etherscan is the gold standard" "We need an Etherscan experience" "We need to be more like Etherscan" I will never understand why this everyone's "preferred" user experience.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
which explorer is better?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Yeah exactly. It's just the best option available. That does not mean that it is good or desirable. But this is what we have right now. Question for OP, how would you want it to be?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
For me, it’s an amazing explorer. Without etherscan, the blockchain wouldn’t be readable (aka other chains are not really readable) and all of the data & projects would be worth 0. That said, the reading got more complicated with new developments like l2s and DEX aggregators. It would be better if 1️⃣l1 tx hash was hidden 2️⃣trade overview was shown and the splitting of trades was hidden
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ChristianØ pfp
ChristianØ
@christian
From a UX standpoint, @onceuponxyz was better. And it's a simple concept really, as the flow of new users increases in an ecosystem, the level of technical literacy required to navigate should be lowered over time. For example, just tell me what the transaction did, briefly. Then, if I am an advanced user, provide the option to dig deeper. Simple up front. Technical in the back.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction