https://anoncast.org | anonymous posting for $ANON holders, powered by zk proofs | CA 0x0Db510e79909666d6dEc7f5e49370838c16D950f @anontokenbase

The two main critiques of @anoncast over the last day or so have been low quality posts and censorship. Hard problems with no perfect solution, so we're experimenting with the following:

On the @anoncast account:
- 5000 ANON requirement to post
- Posts can no longer be deleted (no censorship)

On Twitter / @anonbangers:
- 2M ANON requirement to promote (quality control)
- Posts can be deleted

If you've complained about censorship, you won't be anymore.
If you've complained about low quality posts, follow @anonbangers.

We'll see how this goes and iterate.

Consumer Crypto

@operator & /operator | building future.news | BCI, bioinformatics, search, chaos, decentralized AI

> Anoncast should have a simple solution: Everything gets posted to an uncensorable page (which the core community but not that many people check). content upvoted or with economic stake behind it will be further distributed to warpcast & twitter via 1 or more dedicated accounts which are high alpha accounts and worth following.

in general for social builders or platforms with user-generated content, this just shows why communities need mods in the beginning while working on tools to (auto-)reduce spam and highlight good content aka make discovery better.

> This applies for telegrams, discords, warpcast, channels

imho every random community on Telegram or Discord "invested" in 2-10 mods (employees or community) but Warpcast channels have for no good reason ignored it and gave up when spam rose with growth.

I'm not a fan of the 5000 Anon requirement to post.
> I want more content, more users at this point, no barriers.
> Anon could be great for discoverability, rewarding contributors, funding affiliated (sub)initiatives & generally growth of the eco

If somebody needs to buy Anon on a Dex/Cex to pay for a post that's a big barrier in my opinion (with likelihood of doxxing though that can be prevented)

@anoncast and @nook / prev: manifold.xyz opensea.io

I'm not a fan of the 5000 Anon requirement to post.
> I want more content, more users at this point, no barriers.
> Anon could be great for discoverability, rewarding contributors, funding affiliated (sub)initiatives & generally growth of the eco

If somebody needs to buy Anon on a Dex/Cex to pay for a post that's a big barrier in my opinion (with likelihood of doxxing though that can be prevented)

https://warpcast.com/juli/0xb1f3d21e

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

yeah all of this is going to change while we come up with the right mechanics, nothing is finalized. project is not even a week old and was never expecting this much interest lol. really appreciate your input, taking into account!