Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
29 recasts
174 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
/coffee had nailed this for awhile with @jpetrich and @drewcoffman.eth /nfl or /nba feels like it had good core group with @bracketgame also leading the charge other suggestions: - @christin, @keccers.eth, @anisha, me around “women health tech” - anybody coding groups
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
I lost interest in posting often in /coffee because there was a while it was overrun with ai bots but I agree it was great and, looking now, seems pretty decent again
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
90% of the channels I posted to I cannot post to now because I would have to find the owner and ask them which I’m never going to do. If you look at Dune metrics for overall fc usage you can visually see the drop off date when FC channel changes happened. The app is a walled garden of walled gardens now. My usage is almost entirely just cross posting interesting stuff that happens on Twitter to here now on my own channel.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
yeah I agree with that. The channel change was a failure
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i mostly post to /ted or to a couple channels i know i have access to sometimes if i don’t have access i save the cast as a draft and it sits there for awhile
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
