Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joel Cares pfp
Joel Cares
@joel
The $nouns contract should have a function to delegate all of its votes. Only Nouns DAO can update the delegate and groups / individuals should be encouraged to compete for the right to administer this large voting block.
3 replies
3 recasts
12 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Eh it’s a lot of voting power. I’d be nervous about that being in one persons hands. It would be cool if we let $nouns holders vote to control the votes of the contract
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Joel Cares pfp
Joel Cares
@joel
Nouns DAO would have to vote to change the delegate, which means DAO proposals control it. $nouns holders voting would also be interesting. I'd hope to see groups push to defend themselves as better stewards of the DAO votes, competing over who is a wiser decision making body with minimized self-interest.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joel Cares pfp
Joel Cares
@joel
And I think it'd be pretty challenging for an individual to make a case stronger than a larger group, so it'd rarely be delegated to an individual.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction