Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

some thoughts on % exit: if every dao spend proportionally reduces the exit value, sounds rational to exit before a large spend and rejoin after. perhaps difficult if holding many nouns, but makes sense if only holding one?
assuming the dao has no significant income (like today).
wdyt @w-g

part of verbs team, working on nouns things

If Nouns are selling at or below book value I see this happening too. Perhaps it provides some downwards pressure on max proposal size, as larger spends incentivize more arb activity around this. Does make an interesting market game.

Ultimately, to fix a lot of things, we need Nouns to have meme value above book value. Then there's some risk to the arb attempt. What if after a huge spend we got more attention, auction prices rose, and they were forced to buy back in at a loss.

Ah yeah - just understanding that point now. So with a big spend looming it's rational to quit and rejoin right after, because your ETH goes further.

this is a risk in the current state. with % exit, nouns are heavily valued based on their exit value. there is no arb on the noun value in that sense. you exit before a spend, and buy back into a dao where your the same ETH buys a larger % of the dao, *regardless of the auction price*