Why do fee-on-volume business models (e.g. Clanker) feel better than fee-on-mint business models (e.g. Zora)? The former feels more positive-sum despite the fact that they're both aligned with attention.

shaping the ideas that shape us /native /believein 🇵🇸

/new-york by day 🗽 /latenightcrew by night :) Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮 oh and /untzuntz 😈

they're both easily trackable onchain tho

One is invisible, the other is a line item

Because with uniswap the user keeps 98% of their money. The Zora + creator fee split is much higher

Potential upside and less upfront cost to users

I think they've each got a place in the wider attention economy, depends on the content being minted. Volume model works for Clanker since we want to make it as approachable/desirable as possible to create/reward economic activity. I see Zora mints more like a patronage/support to an artist I like.

Embracing the Decentralized Revolution 🪙

Great news! @femmie has curated your cast, and it's now featured among today's trending casts at https://casterbites.com

Remember, any Farcaster user can send and vote for the best casts of the day

Fee-on-volume feels like a ‘growth-share’ model, where success scales with engagement