Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
this is a good thread from @bayardo.eth on the current state of @base fees and path forward. he's nuanced and measured, as i'd expect our core protocol leader to be. i want to share a less nuanced perspective: 1. we need to scale the @base EVM >1000x 2. we need to do this with urgency 3. the time to start is right now
8 replies
17 recasts
239 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
I'm sharing this publicly because I think it's important that we have a dialogue about this as an ecosystem — and it's important for us to share our internal dialogue, so all of you can participate. my ask for all of you: share your thoughts in this thread or elsewhere. we need to hear from you!
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
to share a bit more about where i'm coming from, I believe: - ethereum pursued the rollup centric roadmap to scale - L2s are explicitly designed to bootstrap off the decentralization of L1 - this decision should *open up the design space* for L2 - but, i think we are currently *too anchored* to L1 scaling constraints
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
with this framing, I'm challenging our team to: - test our gas limit and understand what we can do to raise it - think from first principles on L2 node hardware needs and constraints - accelerate alternate client implementations and parallization work - challenge ourselves to think outside the box to get more scale
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Paulith
@paulp.eth
What do you mean by “too anchored”? Ethereum L1 alignment is paramount
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
