Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Fair warning: if you keep replying with slop to accounts that donβt follow or engage with you, youβll end up labeled as spam. Be thoughtful. The GPT-assisted attempts are obvious. OK to have a few replies that donβt get any engagement. But if you reply to pretty much every cast and nothing, the problem is most likely you. No one is entitled to another personβs attention.
70 replies
44 recasts
303 reactions
elle
@riotgoools
i noticed another tactic they've been using lately β they just copy my own replies that i've made in the past and send them back at me. and not in the fun copypasta way (β’Μ_β’Μ) it usually doesn't even make sense in the context of what they are replying to
4 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Jerry-d ππ½π© β
@jerry-d
Hmm I may have seen something like that too, Elle. It might be a variation of a GPT assisted response. Guessing that if the original text is too esoteric or based on prior interactions with your audience outside of what it can gather from your historical replies / FC interactions (conversations on FarHouse, etc) the prediction model casts some crap or connects the wrong dots. Anyway, Iβll look for it too now since Dan is asking for examples.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
elle
@riotgoools
i see the gpt paraphrasing a lot too but here i'm talking about verbatim copies. my theory is that by copying human replies they are trying to evade falling under the spam line Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jerry-d ππ½π© β
@jerry-d
Hmm okay Iβll look specifically for exact dups of my casts - thx for explaining further. 300 $WILD
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
