Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Fair warning: if you keep replying with slop to accounts that don’t follow or engage with you, you’ll end up labeled as spam. Be thoughtful. The GPT-assisted attempts are obvious. OK to have a few replies that don’t get any engagement. But if you reply to pretty much every cast and nothing, the problem is most likely you. No one is entitled to another person’s attention.
70 replies
44 recasts
305 reactions
elle
@riotgoools
i noticed another tactic they've been using lately – they just copy my own replies that i've made in the past and send them back at me. and not in the fun copypasta way (•̀_•́) it usually doesn't even make sense in the context of what they are replying to
4 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Next time you see this mind sending me the example?
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
O+<
@spitfunkolips
i noticed another tactic they've been using lately – they just copy my own replies that i've made in the past and send them back at me. and not in the fun copypasta way (•̀_•́) it usually doesn't even make sense in the context of what they are replying to
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Jerry-d 🍖👽🎩 ↑
@jerry-d
Hmm I may have seen something like that too, Elle. It might be a variation of a GPT assisted response. Guessing that if the original text is too esoteric or based on prior interactions with your audience outside of what it can gather from your historical replies / FC interactions (conversations on FarHouse, etc) the prediction model casts some crap or connects the wrong dots. Anyway, I’ll look for it too now since Dan is asking for examples.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BEARBRAINS 🎩🍓
@natebear
See that on x too. More often they'll just slightly rephrase the OP post with gpt for some reason. OP: who the hell likes mayonaise? Bot: i often question why people enjoy mayonaise. Bot: I wonder who likes mayonnaise. Bot: i wonder who is enjoying mayonaise.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
