Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Martin
@koeppelmann.eth
I want Farcaster to succeed as I think it is truly important for humanity to have a "global town square" based on a neutral protocol rather than a platform owned by a single company, or worse, a single person. Still, I keep switching my default behavior to post on Twitter, simply because I get ~10x more resonance on Tweets. I assume (at least in the crypto-Twitter world) I am not the only one in this situation. So maybe some form of vampire attack could work. Try to get at least 1,000 people from CT with >1,000 followers to commit x$ to post exclusively on Farcaster for 1 month. As soon as the 1,000 people are reached, the agreement kicks in and everyone should only post here. Those who break the agreement get "slashed," and the slashed money is distributed among those actually following through. WDYT?
14 replies
186 recasts
657 reactions
Jayricz
@jayricz
I think the barrier for entry for Farcaster should be lifted. The sign up fee has been a blocker to onboard people who are new to decentralized socials. I am a content creator and also market Web3 product but having to pay $5 to setup my app is something a lot of 3rd world citizens can't afford.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction