Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

been thinking about channels ever since @ted posted this

how does farcaster reward people for going deeper on a subject? how does it incentivize @matthewb to share about drinking chocolates or @keccers.eth to go deep on her health stack?

basically…i want to replace my reddit searches with farcaster searches

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

building /juicebox | product marketing & growth | prev. NounsDAO, RAW DAO | learning to code

I’m not sure the Reddit goal you speak of is a core goal of the platform.  I don’t think they envision this place  as a repository for knowledge the way Reddit is.  Their attitude towards expiring data is the chief reason I question this.  Dan has said some data should “fall off” after a few years.  How would that work for great topics where consensus has been found over years?

🥑🍋 Farmer / LAMP stack dev / Husband / 🌈 Dad / Web1 dude loving a web3 world / Collector of things digital & physical / 
CdeP ‘94 

Twitter reigns in the ephemeral space where Reddit is evergreen.  Has /farcaster picked a lane?

Relevant exchange with Dan on the subject:

Relevant exchange with Dan on the subject:  https://warpcast.com/jawa/0xe5a520da

yeah i’m ngl i constantly forget data expires — though the amount of reddit threads with deleted users = deleted content is becoming more and more common